Same income, paid for longer — and an estate left over.

THE DIFFERENCE AT AGE 90
Estate left to the family
$763,493
Years of income (vs 9)
16 years
Return needed to match
11.45%
Male
AGE 55
$100,000
DEPOSIT
10 Years
DURATION
$95,427/yr
NET INCOME
Side by side

The same $95,427 a year — two very different outcomes

MetricStatus quo · alternative investment @ 5%Tax-exempt insurance
The strategy
Deposit$100,000$100,000
Duration10 yrs10 yrs
Initial benefit—$1,221,620
Net income / yr$95,427$95,427
Income paidAge 69–77 · 9 yrsAge 69–84 · 16 yrs
Cumulative income$888,369$1,526,832
Estate at age 90$0$763,493
INCREASED FAMILY WEALTH @ 90
$763,493
Estate left to the family after a full retirement income.
REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN @ 90
11.45%
What the alternative would need to earn to match this.
Income paid

Nine years of income, or sixteen.

Years of income · age 69 onward
Alternative investment @ 5%
Age 69–77 · 9 yrs
Age 69–84 · 16 yrs
Cumulative income received
Both scenarios · $95,427 / yr
$888,369
$1,526,832
Alternative investmentTax-exempt insurance
Figures are illustrative and based on current assumptions, including a non-guaranteed dividend scale; actual results will vary. Both scenarios assume identical annual net income of $95,427; the alternative investment depletes and ceases income earlier. This is a conceptual comparison, not an offer of insurance or a guarantee of future values. Personalized projections require a full illustration. Prepared for educational discussion purposes only. — Return on Life

Same income, longer — and something left.
Let’s run your own illustration.