Book an Appointment
  • Corporate Planning · Retirement Income

Corporate Insured
Retirement Plan (IRP)

Using corporate-owned permanent life insurance to supplement tax-efficient retirement income.
PREPARED BY PETER LOUNT · JULY 17, 2026
THE ILLUSTRATION · $100K/YR × 10 YRS
Income drawn (vs 9 years)
16 years
Estate at age 90 (vs $0)
$763,493
Return needed to match
11.45%

An illustrative, educational document.

Illustrative, educational document

This guide explains the mechanics and considerations of a Corporate Insured Retirement Plan (IRP) in general terms. All figures are illustrative unless a specific client’s policy illustration, corporate tax rate, and cash flow are used. This is not a specific recommendation and does not replace tax, legal, or actuarial advice.
01
THE STRATEGY

What Is a Corporate IRP?

A Corporate Insured Retirement Plan is a strategy where a corporation owns a permanent life insurance policy: typically whole life or universal life, on the life of a shareholder or key employee. Corporate surplus (retained earnings that would otherwise sit as passive investments, taxed annually inside the company) is instead used to fund policy premiums. The policy’s cash value grows on a tax-deferred basis inside the exempt policy shelter, sheltered from the corporation’s annual passive investment income tax.
At retirement, the corporation can access the accumulated cash value, most commonly through a collateral loan against the policy, to supplement the owner’s retirement income, without the withdrawal itself being an immediately taxed corporate distribution. On death, the policy’s death benefit repays any outstanding loan, and the remaining proceeds flow into the corporation’s Capital Dividend Account (CDA), allowing the balance to be paid to the estate or beneficiaries tax-free.
02
HOW IT WORKS

How the Mechanics Work

1

Funding phase

The corporation pays premiums on a permanent policy insuring the shareholder, using retained earnings instead of holding those dollars in a taxable corporate investment account.

2

Accumulation phase

Cash value inside the policy grows tax-deferred. Unlike a corporate investment account, this growth does not generate annual passive income that erodes the small business deduction or triggers refundable tax (Part IV / RDTOH mechanics).

3

Retirement / income phase

Once the owner wants income, the corporation (or the owner personally, depending on structure) borrows against the policy’s cash surrender value through a collateral loan from a bank or the insurer. Loan proceeds are not taxable income when received, because they are borrowed funds, not a withdrawal or dividend.

4

Repayment at death

The policy’s death benefit is used first to repay the outstanding collateral loan (principal and accrued interest). The remainder of the death benefit, the amount exceeding the policy’s adjusted cost basis, credits the corporation’s Capital Dividend Account, letting that amount be paid out to beneficiaries as a tax-free capital dividend.
03
WHY NOT JUST RETAIN EARNINGS

Why a Corporation Uses This Instead of Retained Earnings

ConsiderationRetained earnings · taxable accountCorporate IRP · exempt policy + loan
Preferred
Annual tax dragPassive income taxed annually inside the corporation each yearNone: cash value grows tax-deferred inside the exempt policy
Retirement accessFully accessible, but withdrawal is a taxable dividend/salaryCollateral loan is not taxable income when received; interest cost applies
Death benefit treatmentRemaining balance is a taxable corporate asset in the estateDeath benefit repays the loan; balance flows to CDA: tax-free to beneficiaries

Simplified comparison. Actual outcomes depend on the corporation’s tax rate, the specific policy’s cash value growth, and the timing/size of any collateral loan.

04
THE NUMBERS

Illustrated Example: Retirement Income Outcomes

Illustration, not a projection for this client

The figures below come from a Return on Life illustration for a 55-year-old male depositing $100,000 over 10 years, comparing an alternative investment earning 5% against a tax-exempt insurance strategy funding the same $95,427/year net income: the same collateral-loan mechanic described above. Figures are illustrative, based on a non-guaranteed dividend scale, and are not specific to any particular client or corporation.
The corporation redirects surplus otherwise destined for a passive investment account into a participating whole life policy. At retirement, income is drawn as a collateral loan against the policy’s cash value rather than a taxable dividend or withdrawal. Because the policy is not depleted by taxable withdrawals the way an investment account is, it can sustain the same annual income for longer, and still leave a death benefit for the estate.
MetricStatus quo · alternative investment @ 5%Tax-exempt insurance strategy
The strategy
Deposit$100,000$100,000
Duration10 years10 years
Net income per year$95,427$95,427
Income paidAge 69–77 (9 years)Age 69–84 (16 years)
Cumulative income received$888,369$1,526,832
Estate value at age 90$0$763,493
INCREASED FAMILY WEALTH @ AGE 90
$763,493
Estate left to the family after a full retirement income, versus $0 with the alternative investment.
REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN TO MATCH
11.45%
What the alternative investment would need to earn annually to match this strategy’s combined income and estate outcome.
These figures are illustrative only. The actual accumulated cash value, available loan capacity, and long-term sustainability of loan-funded income depend entirely on the specific policy’s illustrated (non-guaranteed) performance, the loan interest rate charged, and how long income is drawn. A client-specific in-force illustration, using the actual insured’s age, health, and the corporation’s real surplus, is required before using any figure like this in a recommendation.
05
RISKS

Key Risks and Considerations

01

Collateral loan interest accrues

If loan interest is not paid currently, it compounds against the policy and can erode the death benefit or, in an extreme case, cause the policy to lapse with a taxable disposition.
02

Policy performance is not guaranteed

Participating and universal life illustrations show a projected scenario, not a guarantee. Underperformance versus the illustration reduces both available loan capacity and the eventual CDA credit.
03

Lending risk

The lender (bank or insurer) sets loan-to-cash-value limits and can adjust them. A shortfall in policy value relative to the outstanding loan can trigger a demand for additional collateral or repayment.
04

CRA scrutiny of leveraged insurance strategies

CRA has, in specific circumstances, challenged aggressive leveraged insurance arrangements (e.g., 10/8 plans) where the loan and policy were too tightly and artificially linked. A properly structured, conservatively leveraged IRP is a recognized planning tool, but the structure must be clean and well-documented.
05

Not a fit for every corporation

This strategy generally suits a corporation with a stable surplus it does not need for operations, a shareholder who is insurable, and a genuine desire for both retirement income and estate/tax-free legacy value, not simply the cheapest source of retirement income.
06
HOW IT GETS BUILT

A Team Effort, Not a Single Advisor

A Corporate IRP sits at the intersection of insurance underwriting, corporate tax planning, and lending. The insurance advisor selects and structures the policy and models realistic (not best-case) illustrations. The corporation’s accountant confirms the impact on passive income tax, the small business deduction, and the Capital Dividend Account mechanics. A lender or the insurer’s loan desk sets the actual collateral loan terms, which the accountant and insurance advisor should both review before any loan is drawn. For larger arrangements, a corporate/tax lawyer should confirm the structure will not be viewed as an aggressive leveraged plan. None of these parties should structure this alone: the strategy only works as intended when all three sign off together.

The insurance advisor

Selects and structures the policy and models realistic (not best-case) illustrations.

The accountant

Confirms the impact on passive income tax, the small business deduction, and the CDA mechanics.

The lender & lawyer

Set the collateral-loan terms and, for larger plans, confirm the structure is not an aggressive leveraged arrangement.

Before implementation

Confirm the in-force policy illustration at current (not original) assumptions, the lender’s actual loan-to-value terms, and the corporation’s current passive income tax exposure with the client’s accountant: before recommending or funding this strategy.
Prepared by Peter Lount, Return on Life. This document is for general educational and planning discussion purposes. It does not constitute tax, legal, or insurance advice specific to any individual or corporation. Consult the client’s tax and legal advisors before implementing a Corporate Insured Retirement Plan.

Retirement income that outlasts the alternative.
Let’s see whether an IRP fits your corporation.

Book a Free Consultation →
Take the Wealth Snapshot →